[IGFmaglist] MAil II- Additonal pts.Re: Main Session - IGF way forward and the Internet Ecosystem Report, update and Proposed Next steps

[Subi Chaturvedi]

Dear Janis,

Thank you for your email.  And for making the time to respond. Both
possibilities lend themselves to a good discussion for this main focus
session.

I was leaning away from limiting it to meetings because there are several
more that can be added to the list and then meetings assume importance for
a limited time and culminate in reports. While we can respond to these
reports and outcomes and they are quite significant, we thought they should
be a part of this session. And not be the only thing in the session. Since
in the original discussion we were trying to address larger issues of the
overall internet ecosystem and the role that IGF can play and therefore the
way forward. The meetings are important but episodal.

With the main focus being on institutional responses to the strands that
you outlined in your first mail/meeting.

UN/Intergovernmental/MS processes/ initiatives including
ISOC/IETF/Netmundial/W3C/ F coalition n others too.

The speakers will remain almost the same in both the approaches.
The one that we are currently suggesting is slightly more broader. Since we
didn't want to cherry pick on some meetings/events and leave out the others.

So if the host/parent institution of all these initiatives are present then
we get the opportunity to not just get them to share what these initiatives
recommend for IGF and the ecosystem but also get them to comment on
interlinkages/commonalities and how silos in IG can be avoided while
responding to the role of IGF and their vision/expectations from it and
from each other.

One Step to help bridge the gap between the two options is to request the
confirmed speakers via the briefing note to speak broadly about the
institutional engagement with a specific focused intervention to the
meetings that you have appropriately outlined. That way we meet the broad
brush objectives and elicit meeting specific comments in the same session.

We're however open to inputs and suggestions.

Both the threads can be taken forwarded as they are both equally
significant and the resource persons will remain the same and we can use
the briefing document to hit all the right points.

On the very important  IANA transition issue I have a question. Are we
keeping it on the 4th day as the morning main session or should part of it
be brought in on Day III in this session. How to avoid overlap and which
part should be here?

These are just my initial thoughts.Yours, session volunteers and all MAG
members comments welcome to help build consensus around framing this
session in the most effective manner. We'll take this forward accordingly.

Warmest

Subi

On 8 May 2014 14:29, "Janis Karklins" <karklinsj at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Subi,
> Shouldn't we concentrate on the events/processes rather than
organizations:
> NetMundial
> UN CSTD WGEC
> WSIS + 10 review event
> IANA transition
> HL panel report (Chair President Ilves of Estonia)
> Freedom online coalition meeting (?)
> Just a question.
> JK
>
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Subi Chaturvedi <subichaturvedi at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Sorry sent you the earlier draft. Please add Peter Major- UNCSTD and
Walda Roseman (ISOC/ITU) to the list as well of suggested speakers. And Mr.
Wu Honbo or Thomas Gass depending on availability.
>>
>> Both Peter and Walda are in unique positions to inform the discussion
from multiple perspectives. And we must hear from the UN on their vision
for IGF post 2015. It's time for a reaffirmation of commitments and the
future roadmap.
>>
>>
>> warmest
>>
>> Subi
>> ----
>>
>> Subi Chaturvedi
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7 May 2014 16:53, Subi Chaturvedi <subichaturvedi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear MAG members,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ahead of todays call this is a short report on the work done and the
next proposed steps.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> All inputs, and comments are invited online and on the call today as
well. Thank you all for your suggestions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We received extremely constructive inputs and suggestions from all the
volunteers as well as the MAG members who made time to especially write in,
with their suggestions.The group is unanimous in it's decision to keep this
session- Open and inclusive of all stakeholders and broader IG
processes. This will be reflected in the choice of speakers/lead resource
persons, as well for the session.
>>>
>>>
>>> The speakers may be given 4 minutes to respond to key policy questions
in IG.
>>>
>>> This is about 52 minutes leaving 40 minutes for questions and the Open
Mic from the floor.
>>>
>>>
>>> Identified threads - Now we have 5 threads to structure the strands.
>>>
>>>
>>> Principles;
>>> Processes (fora);
>>> Actors
>>> Outcome/Issues
>>> Scope/coverage
>>>
>>>  The Speakers/Lead discussants may be asked to respond to the following
questions-
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. Issues-What’s Broken?
>>>
>>> 2. Challenges- How do we Fix it n what are the roadblocks?
>>>
>>> 3. Process Solutions/Path Ahead- Oppurtunities of co-existence
>>>
>>> 4. The role of Govts and their engagement (Speaking from their
stakeholder perspective) beyond Tunis etc.
>>>
>>> 4. Vision for IGF n the ecosystem-Interlinkages (responding also to
IANA, Accountability n initiatives like Netmundial
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> SUGGESTED- (Open to inputs/Suggestions)
>>>
>>> A. The strands/org identified are:
>>>
>>> 1.    IGF- Janis Karklins
>>>
>>> 2.    ITU- Hamadoun Toure’
>>>
>>> 3.    ICANN- Fadi Chehade’
>>>
>>> 4.    ISOC- Kathy Brown/ Markus Kummer
>>>
>>> 5.    IETF-Jari Arkko
>>>
>>> 6.    W3C- Tim Berners Lee
>>>
>>> 7.    Netmundial- Amb. Fonseka/Prof. Virgilio (Chair)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> B. Stakeholder Speakers (Suggested)
>>>
>>> 1.    Academia: Milton Mueller/ Stephanie Parrin/ Wolfgang Kleinwächter
>>>
>>> 2.    Civil Society: Nnenna, Jovan (Diplo)/   Ron Dilbert (Citizen Lab)
>>>
>>> 3.    Technical Community: Avri Doria, Byron Holland (CIRA)
>>>
>>> 4.    Private Sector: Vint Cert, Zahid Jamil
>>>
>>> 5.    Government: 2-3  (from developing country  and another from the
developed C) Proposed names - Neelie Kroes VP-EU and  Ed Vaizy  (The
Swedish ministers have also been vocal and then there’s Marco Civil.
Requesting one from BRICS (Brazil, India, Russia China, South Africa might
work here.)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Since this is a main, we need leaders of organisations who can speak to
the 4 key constructs identified by the volunteers of the groups with
provocative inputs and responses from active, experienced voices from
within the stakeholder community.
>>>
>>> The session moderators should be able to get the most out of each
speaker and keep it conversational and also have the ability to ensure that
all the leads, speak to the questions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you all for your inputs. Do please respond to the suggested names
and questions. All inputs from the MAG members are welcome. If there are
any suggestions on the Session title they're also welcome.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  warmest
>>>
>>>
>>> Subi
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> Subi Chaturvedi
>>>
>>>
>>> Assistant Prof. Journalism & Comm,
>>>
>>> Lady Shri Ram College for Women (LSR),
>>>
>>> Delhi University, India
>>>
>>> Twitter:@subichaturvedi
>>>
>>>
>>> Member MAG, UN-IGF (Media & Civil Society)
>>>
>>> Member MAG, India-IGF (Civil Society)
>>>
>>> Convenor  WG-India IGF
>>>
>>> Co-Chair, Netmundial Brazil (Civil Society)
>>>
>>>
>>> Founder & Hon. Managing Trustee,
>>>
>>> Media For Change
>>>
>>>
>>> Founder, Chief Mentor & Editor
>>>
>>> The Saltlist
>>>
>>> www.thesaltlist.org
>>>
>>>
>>> Independent DocumentaryFilmmaker, Photographer,
>>>
>>> Curator, Media Critic & Scholar
>>>
>>>
>>> PhD. Scholar,
>>>
>>> Indian Institute of Technology (IIT-D), New Delhi
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Igfmaglist mailing list
>> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
>> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20140508/bee67062/attachment.htm>