[IGFmaglist] Taking Stock/Emerging Issues Main Session

Carolina Aguerre carolina at lactld.org
Wed Jul 16 17:26:11 EDT 2014


Dear Colleagues,
Thank  you Constance for raising this proposed structure.
I second Mark's comments. I think that one of the benefits of having an 
earlier IGF this year might make it possible to work within the proposed 
timeframe of 8-10 weeks for the MAG to review and work upon these leads.
Best regards,
Carolina

On 16/07/2014 02:03 p.m., CARVELL, Mark wrote:
>
> Dear MAG colleagues
>
> Thank you Constance: I welcome this proposal in identifying the 
> principal operational objective for this session which is to 
> commission further work to be undertaken inter-sessionally and 
> reported back to the 2015 IGF. That would not be simply a revisit or 
> update of these emerging issues one year on - but crucially a measure 
> of how they have advanced with concrete progress, identifying what 
> more needs to be done, and assessing whether a sufficient range of 
> options, solutions and/or opportunities (e.g. for capacity building) 
> has been successfully identified through this distributed 
> inter-sessional activity.
>
> I would add one more step to assist the IGF Chair with his report: the 
> Taking Stock/Emerging Issues session should be tasked with identifying 
> and soliciting potential leads foir the inter-sessional workstreams, 
> from amongst the national and regional IGFs as well as other Internet 
> governance entities, standards bodies and processes. The 
> identification of these leads could be provisional, not set in stone, 
> but reviewed (perhaps by the MAG?) after a short period (8-10 weeks?) 
> following the IGF, in order to finalise expectations and the 
> programmes of work. This time period would also allow other entities 
> time to consider and take decisions whether they would pick up any 
> inter-sessional workstreams.
>
> It will also be important for the chairs or rapporteurs of the other 
> IGF Main Sessions to take account of the outcomes and conclusions from 
> the relevant workshops and dynamic coalitions in Istanbul (e.g. on net 
> neutrality) prior to reporting into the Taking Stock/Emerging Issues 
> main session. I'm not sure how this "feeder" functionality can be best 
> realised within a tight timeframe but I think tangibly securing these 
> thematic linkages is important, not only for enhancing the cohesion of 
> the Internet Governance Forum as an event with many strands, but also 
> for ensuring that the subsequent programme of inter-sessional activity 
> does not replicate or duplicate exchanges and preparatory activities 
> already undertaken before or at Istanbul.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Mark
>
> Mark Carvell
>
> DCMS: Global Internet Governance Policy
>
> United Kingdom Government
>
> Tel +44 20- 7211 6062
>
> *From:*Igfmaglist [mailto:igfmaglist-bounces at intgovforum.org] *On 
> Behalf Of *Constance Bommelaer
> *Sent:* 16 July 2014 17:12
> *To:* Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org IGF
> *Subject:* [IGFmaglist] Taking Stock/Emerging Issues Main Session
>
> Dear MAG colleagues,
>
> This is to collect your thoughts on the organization of the Main 
> Session Taking Stock / Emerging Issues (day 4, 5 Sept. )
>
> A possible structure could be to invite the chairs/rapporteurs of 
> other Main Sessions (Development, Net neutrality, Ecosystem evolution, 
> Best practices, IANA transition) to:
>
>   * Share the main outpus of their group's discussion;
>   * Identify emerging issues that could be picked-up through
>     inter-sessional work between IGF 2014 and IGF 2015.
>
> Each rapporteur would limit itself to 5-7 min (30 - 35 min in total). 
> Then, my understanding is that the host country would present its 
> report, as well as the Chair (30 min in total). The final portion of 
> the session (30 min) would be for interaction with the audience with 
> the understanding that during the Open mic session (afternoon of the 
> same day) people can further comment on topics.
>
> Thoughts and suggestions welcome.
>
> Thank you and best regards,
>
> -- 
>
> Constance Bommelaer
>
> Senior Director, Global Policy Partnerships
>
> The Internet Society
>
> www.isoc.org <http://www.isoc.org>
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Constance Bommelaer 
> <bommelaer at isoc.org <mailto:bommelaer at isoc.org>> wrote:
>
> Hi Janis,
>
> Before I send a note to the MAG list regarding the structure of the 
> Taking Stock/Emerging Issues Main Session (I have been listed as 
> organizer), I wanted to touch base with you.
>
> A possible structure could be to invite the chairs/rapporteur from 
> each Main Session:
>
>   * To share the main outputs of their group's discussion.
>   * To identify emerging issues that could be picked-up through
>     inter-sessional work between IGF 2014 and IGF 2015.
>
> The challenge will be to keep enough time for interaction with the 
> audience though.
>
> I recall you had a clear idea on how to organize the discussion. 
> Please let me know your thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Constance
>
>
> This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus 
> service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM 
> Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call 
> your organisations IT Helpdesk.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored 
> and/or recorded for legal purposes.
>
> ****************************************************************************
> This email and its contents are the property of the Department for 
> Culture, Media and Sport.
> If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it.
> All DCMS e-mail is recorded and stored for a minimum of 6 months
> The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government 
> Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in 
> partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) 
> This email has been certified virus free.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored 
> and/or recorded for legal purposes.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org


-- 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20140716/f8086a83/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Sign_CarolinaAguerre.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 12816 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org/attachments/20140716/f8086a83/attachment.jpg>


More information about the Igfmaglist mailing list