[Evolintgov2014] [IGFmaglist] IGF Main Session - Evolution of IG Ecosystem-Update

Thu Jul 31 00:25:34 EDT 2014

Thanks Janis. Sounds great.

Agree completely, will await your communication to take this further.

warmest

Subi
----

On 31 July 2014 01:22, <karklinsj at gmail.com> wrote:

>  Subi
> Thank you for sharing information and your thoughts.
> I would like to inform you that I have been approached by the World
> Economic Forum who is launching the NetMundial initiative in support of the
> IGF and bringing the IG issues at the Davos annual meeting of the WEF.
> The presentation of the initiative is set for 28 August in GVA at the WEF
> HQ.
> Without interfering in the process of preparation of the “IGF evolution”
> session I just wanted to indicate that EVOLINTGOV seems the right place
> where this initiative could be briefly presented as a new advocacy
> initiative. If you re agreeable I could put you in touch with Alan Marcus,
> Head of IT industries at the WEF, for further discussions.
> Best regards
> JK
>
> Sent from Surface
>
> *From:* Subi Chaturvedi <subichaturvedi at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* ‎Wednesday‎, ‎July‎ ‎30‎, ‎2014 ‎9‎:‎35‎ ‎PM
> *To:* Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>
> *Cc:* igfmaglist at intgovforum.org <Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>,
> evolintgov2014 <evolintgov2014 at intgovforum.org>
>
> Thanks Avri.
>
> Right list.
>
> We proposed and agreed to have both on this one. The first 90 mins to be
> used for IGF and other processes Including but not limited to Netmundial,
> WSIS etc. Outlining the IG ecosystem but also specifics of what it entails
> for IGF and the future.
>
> And the second 90 minute slot out of a total of 3 hours for this main for
> implementable, solutions for Strengthening the IGF, ground up including
> outcomes, capacity etc.
>
> Found this on the new link that Markus just shared about ISOC's initiative
> to support IGF.
> Looks like a workable description of goals and outcomes of what we do and
> what we can be.. Both possibilities and limits and Opps
>
> "the IGF:
> -While there is no negotiated outcome of the meeting, the IGF informs and
> inspires those with policy-making power. At the annual meeting delegates
> discuss, exchange information and share good practices with each other.
>
> -Assists in helping people understand how to maximize Internet
> opportunities and address risks and challenges that arise.
>
> -Is also a space that gives developing countries the same opportunities as
> wealthier nations to engage in the debate on Internet governance.
> Ultimately, the involvement of all stakeholders, from developed as well as
> developing countries, is necessary for the future development of the
> Internet."
>
> With substantive inputs from various global processes and initiatives like
> Netmundial and WGEC, we hope this 3 hr session will reveraberate, lean in,
> listen and deliver.
>
> *Hopefully, with time for about 80 identified speaking slots if we limit
> the interventions to a min each between both the sessions(3 hrs).*
>
> However speakers or heads of organisations with new voices too, from
> accross stakeholder groups may be given slots of about 3 mins each for
> their interventions. They might function as the glue which may keep gently
> nudging the discussion forward as relevant interludes.
>
> I still hope that we can buck most trends if not all. And despite your
> previous commitment to the the IANA session I hope that you will make time
> for an intervention on this one too.
>
> We need more women in tech and IG and certainly more voices from the
> technical community and ones like yours with the ability to integrate the
> ethos would be a valuable addition to the session.
>
> Proposed/Suggested Format: with two moderators/facilitators
>
>
>
> 
>
> Add: Session Rapporteurs and remote moderators here and attached.
>
> Regards
>
> Subi
>
>
>
> On 30 Jul 2014 21:42, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a basic question as I have been following this somewhat but
> > relativelyonly in the background.
> >
> > Is this a session about the IG ecosystem at large or is this the one
> > about specific ways in which to make the IGF an active and functional
> > forum?  I had thought that after a bit of discussion there had been a
> > decision to devote at least one discussion main session to ways in which
> > the IGF could become more outcome oriented; a session that took the
> > lessons learned from the milestone event the NETMundial and applied them
> > to the IGF as a continuous forum.  This was a session I was happy to see
> > added and one that I think is critical to IGF having a basis to continue
> > to exist.
> >
> > Forgive me if I am on the wrong list, but while discussion of the
> > ecosystem are all the rage these days, they do not directly address the
> > issue of how to fix the IGF.   And it desperately needs a major overhaul.
> >
> > I am not sure I can make your upcoming call, and as I admit, I may be on
> > the wrong list.  I do like the idea of have 0 panelists and just floor
> > participation moderated by one or two individuals.  I think part of the
> > problem with main sessions is not that there are too many workshops as
> > some argue, but that they are dull repetitions of the same ole' talking
> > heads talking.   For many IGF panels, all one has to do is go back to
> > the recording of the previous year, to hear 80% of what is going to be
> > said this year.  An exciting and new format would be a real win.
> >
> > avri
> >
> >
> > On 30-Jul-14 10:29, Subi Chaturvedi wrote:
> > > Dear All,
> > >
> > > Two senior colleagues Mrs. Kroes (EU) -Stakeholder group-Gov.
> > > And Milton Mueller(Academia/Civil Society) have confirmed their
> > > availability in addition to Ms. Kathy Brown *ISOC)-; Technical
> Community.
> > >
> > > Colleagueas on the MAG do please confirm if your organisation's
> > > participating. You've been copied on all mails which were sent out
> > > previously.
> > >
> > > There's a call scheduled between the two co-leads and Mathew and Markus
> > > have also provided inputs along with substantive inputs from Constance,
> > > Vlada, Bill, Paul, Olga, Ana and others. Not sure if Markus will be on
> > > the call today but we have a wide pool of options from accross
> > > stakeholder groups and some names for moderators to choose from.
> > >
> > > All of them have been metaculously documented across several emails.
> > >
> > > Your inputs have been most conducive.
> > >
> > > Today there will be discussion further on refining format and policy
> > > questions.
> > >
> > > Suggestions pertaining to :
> > > 1. Exact nos. Of questions to be adressed, so that we keep maximum time
> > > for participation and interventions from the floor and non
> facilitators.
> > > 2. Format:
> > > A-no moderator
> > > B-4 moderators
> > > C-deep well with identified interventions for 3 mins each and then abt
> > > 40 minute long interventions from different stakeholder groups for each
> > > of the two halves.  Total of 80 interventions.
> > > D. A general chair some disucussants and then open mic with audience
> > > interventions only
> > > E. A roundtable with concentric circles
> > > D. An open space
> > >
> > > 3.Contact details of speakers recommended by you
> > > (We hope to send out invites by the end of this week, since inputs have
> > > been received on session format the moratorium imposed on inviting
> > > speakers can I believe be lifted to give them enough notice to block
> > > their calenders)
> > > (Olga I have your recommendations down) and some are self nominations.
> > > So we have them too.
> > > Need Patrick's, Bill's and Igor's.
> > >
> > > 4. Some Govt. And CS groups in particular are travelling with youth
> > > volunteers.  Can they join us too for the session? Would they like to
> > > nominate some? Participants from the Dynamic Coalition on core Internet
> > > values will have some.
> > >
> > > Any other inputs.
> > >
> > > If anybody else wishes to join the call, please feel free and contact
> > > Ms. Marilyn Cade to join in.
> > >
> > > We'll be updating the list soon.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Subi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Evolintgov2014 mailing list
> > > Evolintgov2014 at intgovforum.org
> > >
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/evolintgov2014_intgovforum.org
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Evolintgov2014 mailing list
> > Evolintgov2014 at intgovforum.org
> >
> http://mail.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/evolintgov2014_intgovforum.org
>
> .
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/evolintgov2014_intgovforum.org/attachments/20140731/c7716568/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Townhall IGF MAIN Role of IGF and IG Evol Format.png
Type: image/png
Size: 407397 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/evolintgov2014_intgovforum.org/attachments/20140731/c7716568/attachment.png>