From jlaprise at gmail.com  Wed Nov 19 12:10:56 2014
From: jlaprise at gmail.com (John Laprise)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:10:56 -0600
Subject: [Bp_localcontent] Administrative Change
Message-ID: <010b01d0041b$ca25fe20$5e71fa60$@gmail.com>

FYI

 

Best regards, 

 

John Laprise, Ph.D.

Consulting Scholar

 

 <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jplaprise/>
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jplaprise/

 

 

 

From: Markus Kummer [mailto:markus_kummer at bluewin.ch] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 5:38 AM
To: Wout de Natris; John Laprise
Cc: Chengetai MASANGO; Sorina TELEANU
Subject: Fwd: [IGFmaglist] Best Practice Forums

 

This is Janis' email you can share with your respective lists.

 

Best regards

Markus

 

Begin forwarded message:





From: Janis Karklins <karklinsj at gmail.com <mailto:karklinsj at gmail.com> >

Subject: [IGFmaglist] Best Practice Forums

Date: 18 Nov 2014 14:57:44 GMT+1

To: "igfmaglist at intgovforum.org <mailto:igfmaglist at intgovforum.org> "
<igfmaglist at intgovforum.org <mailto:igfmaglist at intgovforum.org> >

 

Dear MAG Members,

 

I would like to inform you that Constance has asked to be replaced as a lead
facilitator for the Best Practice work-stream. The main reason for her
decision was linked with perception by some among involved that the
coordinator who plays a leading role comes from an organization with strong
views on these issues.

 

I  asked Markus Kummer if he would agree to carry work forward until the
finalization of the first set of five compilations. I am pleased to inform
you that Markus has agreed to coordinate this work that is still ongoing and
needs to be completed by the December MAG meeting. With experience and
reputation in the community Markus is ideally placed to  conclude this work.

 

Let me also take this opportunity to thank Constance for her work in
reviving the Best Practice Forums and bringing outputs to the current
advanced stage. She has made a great contribution towards taking the IGF a
step forward towards more concrete outcomes in line with recommendations of
the CSTD WG on IGF improvements.

 

Best regards

JK

_______________________________________________
Igfmaglist mailing list
Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org <mailto:Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org> 
http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_localcontent_intgovforum.org/attachments/20141119/f40ff79d/attachment.htm>

From wales.baky at googlemail.com  Wed Nov 19 12:47:27 2014
From: wales.baky at googlemail.com (Olawale Bakare)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:47:27 +0000
Subject: [Bp_localcontent] [Bp_multistakeholder] Administrative Change
In-Reply-To: <010b01d0041b$ca25fe20$5e71fa60$@gmail.com>
References: <010b01d0041b$ca25fe20$5e71fa60$@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAA+cxdd7Kfns-RCt9sg8y5jReZDcu-AcBU15Z_mD4aFdq4LvVQ@mail.gmail.com>

Dear John,

Thanks for the email.

Regards,
Wale
On Nov 19, 2014 5:10 PM, "John Laprise" <jlaprise at gmail.com> wrote:

> FYI
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> John Laprise, Ph.D.
>
> Consulting Scholar
>
>
>
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/jplaprise/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Markus Kummer [mailto:markus_kummer at bluewin.ch]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 19, 2014 5:38 AM
> *To:* Wout de Natris; John Laprise
> *Cc:* Chengetai MASANGO; Sorina TELEANU
> *Subject:* Fwd: [IGFmaglist] Best Practice Forums
>
>
>
> This is Janis? email you can share with your respective lists.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Markus
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
>
> *From: *Janis Karklins <karklinsj at gmail.com>
>
> *Subject: [IGFmaglist] Best Practice Forums*
>
> *Date: *18 Nov 2014 14:57:44 GMT+1
>
> *To: *"igfmaglist at intgovforum.org" <igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
>
>
>
> Dear MAG Members,
>
>
>
> I would like to inform you that Constance has asked to be replaced as a
> lead facilitator for the Best Practice work-stream. The main reason for her
> decision was linked with perception by some among involved that the
> coordinator who plays a leading role comes from an organization with strong
> views on these issues.
>
>
>
> I  asked Markus Kummer if he would agree to carry work forward until the
> finalization of the first set of five compilations. I am pleased to inform
> you that Markus has agreed to coordinate this work that is still ongoing
> and needs to be completed by the December MAG meeting. With experience and
> reputation in the community Markus is ideally placed to  conclude this work.
>
>
>
> Let me also take this opportunity to thank Constance for her work in
> reviving the Best Practice Forums and bringing outputs to the current
> advanced stage. She has made a great contribution towards taking the IGF a
> step forward towards more concrete outcomes in line with recommendations of
> the CSTD WG on IGF improvements.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> JK
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_multistakeholder mailing list
> Bp_multistakeholder at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_multistakeholder_intgovforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_localcontent_intgovforum.org/attachments/20141119/91adbf7c/attachment.htm>

From wales.baky at googlemail.com  Wed Nov 19 15:52:45 2014
From: wales.baky at googlemail.com (Olawale Bakare)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 20:52:45 +0000
Subject: [Bp_localcontent] [Bp_multistakeholder] Administrative Change
In-Reply-To: <010b01d0041b$ca25fe20$5e71fa60$@gmail.com>
References: <010b01d0041b$ca25fe20$5e71fa60$@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAA+cxddj+fH4SkYGw1NcOBcVdGeUHa944drB2bObGk7b4HnPLA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,
I don't think members of the Best Practice Forums would have any inputs or
suggestions on this, correct?
Regards,
Wale
On Nov 19, 2014 5:10 PM, "John Laprise" <jlaprise at gmail.com> wrote:

> FYI
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> John Laprise, Ph.D.
>
> Consulting Scholar
>
>
>
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/jplaprise/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Markus Kummer [mailto:markus_kummer at bluewin.ch]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 19, 2014 5:38 AM
> *To:* Wout de Natris; John Laprise
> *Cc:* Chengetai MASANGO; Sorina TELEANU
> *Subject:* Fwd: [IGFmaglist] Best Practice Forums
>
>
>
> This is Janis? email you can share with your respective lists.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Markus
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
>
> *From: *Janis Karklins <karklinsj at gmail.com>
>
> *Subject: [IGFmaglist] Best Practice Forums*
>
> *Date: *18 Nov 2014 14:57:44 GMT+1
>
> *To: *"igfmaglist at intgovforum.org" <igfmaglist at intgovforum.org>
>
>
>
> Dear MAG Members,
>
>
>
> I would like to inform you that Constance has asked to be replaced as a
> lead facilitator for the Best Practice work-stream. The main reason for her
> decision was linked with perception by some among involved that the
> coordinator who plays a leading role comes from an organization with strong
> views on these issues.
>
>
>
> I  asked Markus Kummer if he would agree to carry work forward until the
> finalization of the first set of five compilations. I am pleased to inform
> you that Markus has agreed to coordinate this work that is still ongoing
> and needs to be completed by the December MAG meeting. With experience and
> reputation in the community Markus is ideally placed to  conclude this work.
>
>
>
> Let me also take this opportunity to thank Constance for her work in
> reviving the Best Practice Forums and bringing outputs to the current
> advanced stage. She has made a great contribution towards taking the IGF a
> step forward towards more concrete outcomes in line with recommendations of
> the CSTD WG on IGF improvements.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> JK
>
> _______________________________________________
> Igfmaglist mailing list
> Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/igfmaglist_intgovforum.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bp_multistakeholder mailing list
> Bp_multistakeholder at intgovforum.org
> http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_multistakeholder_intgovforum.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_localcontent_intgovforum.org/attachments/20141119/4366332c/attachment.htm>

From jlaprise at gmail.com  Tue Nov 25 14:09:38 2014
From: jlaprise at gmail.com (John Laprise)
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:09:38 -0600
Subject: [Bp_localcontent] FW: IGF Best Practices reports
In-Reply-To: <6792C208-8C3E-4CB5-A75E-ED548C1AF114@bluewin.ch>
References: <6792C208-8C3E-4CB5-A75E-ED548C1AF114@bluewin.ch>
Message-ID: <009601d008e3$5dd9d620$198d8260$@gmail.com>

I offer my hearty thanks to all participants and contributors. It has been a
pleasure working with all of you

Best regards, 

John Laprise, Ph.D.
Consulting Scholar

http://www.linkedin.com/in/jplaprise/

-----Original Message-----
From: Markus Kummer [mailto:markus_kummer at bluewin.ch] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 3:36 AM
To: Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org IGF
Subject: IGF Best Practices reports

Dear all,

In view of next week's MAG meeting / Open Consultations, I am sharing with
you advance copies of the final reports of the five Best Practice Forums. 

You will recall that the MAG identified the following five areas as themes
for the Istanbul Best Practice Forums:

.      Developing meaningful multistakeholder mechanisms
.      Regulation and mitigation of unwanted communications (e.g. spam)
.      Online child protection
.      Establishing and supporting Computer Emergency Response Teams (CERTs)
for Internet security
.      Creating an enabling environment for the development of local content

Each theme was dealt with in one separate session at the IGF 2014 meeting,
while a final wrap-up session brought the outcomes of the individual
sessions to the broader IGF community.

The preparatory process started shortly after the MAG at its Paris meeting
in May decided to hold the Best Practices session. Lead experts managed
email list serves and led global discussions on these topics. They were
supported by the IGF Secretariat, which had recruited two additional experts
for this purpose. Each group published an initial draft prior to the 2014
Istanbul IGF meeting and opened them up for public comment.

At the IGF Best Practice Forum wrap-up session in Istanbul, the broader
community provided additional comments, which were incorporated into the
draft documents. While for some Best Practice Forums most of the work was
done through the online process, for others, the physical meeting in
Istanbul provided a valuable corrective with some substantial additions. The
reports were finalized in an online process. 

The lead experts noted that each thread had found rough consensus on some
issues and acknowledged that further work in each area was needed. The final
outcome documents in each of these areas reflect the rough consensus views
of the lead experts and contributing stakeholders. The reports on each of
the five themes are fairly substantive, but for ease of reference each
report is preceded by a two page executive summary which highlights the
areas of consensus and also notes divergent views. Of particular interest
for next week's meeting are the suggestions for future work which are
brought to the attention of the MAG and all interested stakeholders.

The reports are now being formatted and will undergo some final editing
(mainly ensuring language consistency) by the IGF Secretariat. They will be
made available on the IGF website later this week .

Best regards
Markus


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: BPF MSH Master.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 36014 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_localcontent_intgovforum.org/attachments/20141125/8c68bd96/attachment.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: BPF LC Master.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 37035 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_localcontent_intgovforum.org/attachments/20141125/8c68bd96/attachment-0001.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: BPF CP Master.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 42538 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_localcontent_intgovforum.org/attachments/20141125/8c68bd96/attachment-0002.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Report BPF CSIRT 25.11.14.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 89615 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_localcontent_intgovforum.org/attachments/20141125/8c68bd96/attachment-0003.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: BPF Report Spam, 25-11-14.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 127405 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_localcontent_intgovforum.org/attachments/20141125/8c68bd96/attachment-0004.docx>

From kolubahzizi at yahoo.com  Tue Nov 25 19:21:06 2014
From: kolubahzizi at yahoo.com (Kolubahzizi T. Howard)
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 00:21:06 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [Bp_localcontent] FW: IGF Best Practices reports
In-Reply-To: <009601d008e3$5dd9d620$198d8260$@gmail.com>
References: <009601d008e3$5dd9d620$198d8260$@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1104364402.657442.1416961266773.JavaMail.yahoo@jws100201.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>

I also add the thanks and appreciation of the ISOC Liberia Chapter to Wout for his work on our behalf.
Many thanks Wout.?Kolubahzizi T. Howard 
President 
ISOC Liberia Chapter &
Director of Strategy
Liberia Telecommunications Authority (LTA) 
+231-776200000/+231880539961/+231-555660001 

     On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 7:10 PM, John Laprise <jlaprise at gmail.com> wrote:
   

 I offer my hearty thanks to all participants and contributors. It has been a
pleasure working with all of you

Best regards, 

John Laprise, Ph.D.
Consulting Scholar

http://www.linkedin.com/in/jplaprise/

-----Original Message-----
From: Markus Kummer [mailto:markus_kummer at bluewin.ch] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 3:36 AM
To: Igfmaglist at intgovforum.org IGF
Subject: IGF Best Practices reports

Dear all,

In view of next week's MAG meeting / Open Consultations, I am sharing with
you advance copies of the final reports of the five Best Practice Forums. 

You will recall that the MAG identified the following five areas as themes
for the Istanbul Best Practice Forums:

.? ? ? Developing meaningful multistakeholder mechanisms
.? ? ? Regulation and mitigation of unwanted communications (e.g. spam)
.? ? ? Online child protection
.? ? ? Establishing and supporting Computer Emergency Response Teams (CERTs)
for Internet security
.? ? ? Creating an enabling environment for the development of local content

Each theme was dealt with in one separate session at the IGF 2014 meeting,
while a final wrap-up session brought the outcomes of the individual
sessions to the broader IGF community.

The preparatory process started shortly after the MAG at its Paris meeting
in May decided to hold the Best Practices session. Lead experts managed
email list serves and led global discussions on these topics. They were
supported by the IGF Secretariat, which had recruited two additional experts
for this purpose. Each group published an initial draft prior to the 2014
Istanbul IGF meeting and opened them up for public comment.

At the IGF Best Practice Forum wrap-up session in Istanbul, the broader
community provided additional comments, which were incorporated into the
draft documents. While for some Best Practice Forums most of the work was
done through the online process, for others, the physical meeting in
Istanbul provided a valuable corrective with some substantial additions. The
reports were finalized in an online process. 

The lead experts noted that each thread had found rough consensus on some
issues and acknowledged that further work in each area was needed. The final
outcome documents in each of these areas reflect the rough consensus views
of the lead experts and contributing stakeholders. The reports on each of
the five themes are fairly substantive, but for ease of reference each
report is preceded by a two page executive summary which highlights the
areas of consensus and also notes divergent views. Of particular interest
for next week's meeting are the suggestions for future work which are
brought to the attention of the MAG and all interested stakeholders.

The reports are now being formatted and will undergo some final editing
(mainly ensuring language consistency) by the IGF Secretariat. They will be
made available on the IGF website later this week .

Best regards
Markus



_______________________________________________
Bp_localcontent mailing list
Bp_localcontent at intgovforum.org
http://intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_localcontent_intgovforum.org


   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://intgovforum.org/pipermail/bp_localcontent_intgovforum.org/attachments/20141126/3f3895f0/attachment.htm>